|
Saving Costs and Breakdown Incidence with the PressureGuard Renew
Maggie Bork, RN, BSN, CETN; Vencor, San Diego
Clinical Reports: Series on Skin and Wound Care Management, April 1998.
Replacing 28 of their 65 beds with PressureGuard Renew resulted in cost savings
of $16,460.15 per month after a dramatic decrease in the rental of treatment mattresses.
Long Term Usage of the PressureGuard II for the High-Risk/High Needs Patient
in the Long Term and Subacute Setting
Denise Szczygiel, LPN; Integrated Health Services,Pinellas Park,FL
In 9 months of use, the PressureGuard II filled the prevention or treatment needs
of 92% (69 of 75) of the patients placed on it. Only three percent (2 of 75)
experienced further skin breakdown secondary to other health complications.
Effect of the PressureGuard II on the Incidence Rates of Facility-Acquired Pressure
Ulcers
Leila Knox, RN, CETN; Casa Metropolitan Rehabilitation Center, Fresno, CA; February,
1997.
This 233-bed long-term-care and subacute facility replaced 125 (56%) of their
mattresses with PressureGuard II mattresses. Their incidence rates of facility
acquired Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers decreased by 66%, and remained at
those levels for more than 2 years. This prompted them to replace the remainder
of their mattresses with PressureGuard II’s.
Pressure Ulcer Pain: Assessment and Quantification
Dallam L et al; JWOCN 22(5), Sept 1995.
A cross-sectional study design was used to document the perception of pressure
ulcer pain in 132 patients in an acute care setting. “Subjects placed on [the
PressureGuard II] had significantly less pain (p<0.01) than those whose lesions
were not managed by this technique, including those placed on other pressure-reducing
devices.”
Bed Selection
Community Hospitals, Indianapolis
Poster presented at the National WOCN Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 1998.
This poster exhibits the Bed Selection Guide produced by the ET nurses of the
facility for choosing one of the five specialty mattresses available. The Guide
begins with the PressureGuard II, which is their house-wide surface. Indications
for use include Stage I or Stage II pressure ulcers, or Stage III or Stage IV
ulcers on one turning surface, and with the patient’s weight less than 350 lbs.
Evaluating the Long-Term Performance of a Foam-Core Hospital Replacement
Krouskop T et al; JWOCN 21(6), Nov 1994
This study compares the stiffness of new foam replacement mattresses to 2-year-old
mattresses. Stiffness at the sacral-coccyx region decreased 53%, heel region
decreased 41%, and the head region decreased 30%. A new foam replacement product
may approximate the “ideal” load carrying needs, but these abilities will change
significantly with time. Foam/air combination mattresses, such as the PressureGuard
Renew, with re-inflatable air tubes, will retain their pressure reducing capabilities
over time.
Copies of any of the above articles and testimonials can be obtained on request.
Please contact Customer Service at 800-888-6752.
Address questions to Laurie Rappl, PT, CWS, Clinical Support Manager, at x 6942.
|